Anthropic reached a settlement in the copyright class-action lawsuit last year. The court ruled that Anthropic's use of copyrighted materials to train AI models was protected under the "fair use" doctrine, making it legal, but using pirated materials did not fall under fair use protection. As a result, Anthropic will compensate the authors of nearly 500,000 pirated works used to train its models, with a compensation standard of $3,000 (approximately 20,203 RMB) per work, totaling $1.5 billion (approximately 10.102 billion RMB) in settlement funds. The settlement plan was finally approved this July, and the compensation payments have since begun.
Publishers Claim More Than Their Share, Authors Question Openly
According to the settlement agreement, if the relevant books are still published by traditional publishers, the compensation will be split equally between the authors and the publishers; if the book is self-published by the author or the publisher has discontinued the book and returned the rights to the author, the full $3,000 compensation should go to the author.
However, recently some authors have posted on social media stating that some publishers seem to be claiming more than their rightful share of the compensation. Suspense and thriller writer April Henry openly questioned HarperCollins, saying that the publisher had claimed compensation for a book she had returned the rights to at least 17 years ago. Additionally, she discovered that HarperCollins had been added to her credit record as an "employer" on the same day, although she had never worked for the company.
Mismanagement of Records, Literary Agencies Also Want a Share
Victoria Strauss, the author of the well-known writers' advocacy blog Writers Beware, said that recent complaints from authors generally fall into two categories: one is that publishers are claiming compensation for works they no longer hold the legal copyright to; the second is that publishers secretly applied for 100% of the compensation, while according to the settlement agreement, they were only entitled to 50%.
However, Strauss believes that such situations usually stem from "poor copyright record management and complex settlement procedures," rather than "publishers deliberately trying to take money." Some publishers have already admitted the claims were incorrect and are requesting corrections from Anthropic.
Join Now