%20--%3e%3cdefs%3e%3cstyle%3e%20.st0%20{%20fill:%20%23061b40;%20}%20.st1%20{%20fill:%20%23306af1;%20}%20.st2%20{%20fill:%20%235ce5cf;%20}%20%3c/style%3e%3c/defs%3e%3cg%3e%3cpath%20class='st0'%20d='M55,10.5h9v3h-9v9h12V7.5h-12v3ZM64,19.5h-6v-3h6v3Z'/%3e%3cpolygon%20class='st0'%20points='69%2016.5%2078%2016.5%2078%2019.5%2069%2019.5%2069%2022.5%2081%2022.5%2081%2013.5%2072%2013.5%2072%2010.5%2081%2010.5%2081%207.5%2069%207.5%2069%2016.5'/%3e%3cpolygon%20class='st0'%20points='95%2010.5%2095%207.5%2083%207.5%2083%2022.5%2095%2022.5%2095%2019.5%2086%2019.5%2086%2016.5%2095%2016.5%2095%2013.5%2086%2013.5%2086%2010.5%2095%2010.5'/%3e%3cpath%20class='st0'%20d='M40,1.5v21h11.6l1.4-1.4v-7.6h0c0,0-1.4-1.5-1.4-1.5l1.4-1.4V2.9l-1.4-1.4h-11.6ZM50,19.5h-7v-6h7v6ZM50,10.5h-7v-6h7v6Z'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cpath%20class='st1'%20d='M23.1,24L14.7,4.8l-4.9,11.2h3.8l-1.8,4H3.3L12.1,0H2C.9,0,0,.9,0,2v20c0,1.1.9,2,2,2h21.1Z'/%3e%3cpath%20class='st2'%20d='M34,0h-16.8l10.6,24h6.2c1.1,0,2-.9,2-2V2C36,.9,35.1,0,34,0ZM32.5,20h-4V4h4v16Z'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
In the legal battles within the AI field, xAI, a company under Elon Musk, recently faced a setback. U.S. Federal District Judge Rita Lin of San Francisco formally dismissed xAI's lawsuit against OpenAI for allegedly stealing trade secrets and issued a "no further action" ruling, meaning there is no further space for this case to proceed in the judicial system.
The focus of this lawsuit was on Xuechen Li, a former senior engineer at xAI. xAI previously accused OpenAI of luring Li to leak confidential source code and core technical information related to the Grok chatbot. Musk's team believed that OpenAI did this because it was lagging in complex reasoning and post-training technologies, and aimed to make up for its shortcomings by stealing technology.
However, after reviewing the case, the court found that xAI had not provided substantial evidence to support its claim of "inducing leaks," nor could it prove that OpenAI was aware of the leak. The judge stated in the judgment that asking job candidates about their previous work experience during interviews is a common industry practice. If merely this process were used to assume the existence of a theft suspicion, it would create unnecessary legal obstacles for normal business talent mobility. OpenAI strongly denied this, stating that Li never provided any confidential materials to the company.
Notably, this is the second time in four weeks that Musk has lost a legal battle against OpenAI. Just on May 18, Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI and its founder Sam Altman for abandoning the non-profit mission was also rejected by a federal jury.
Regarding this ruling, OpenAI described this lawsuit as part of a "continuous harassment" against the company in a public statement. At present, in addition to the overall lawsuit against the company, xAI has also filed a separate lawsuit against Li personally, and Li has clearly denied any violation of confidentiality. With the judge issuing the final "no further action" ruling, this dispute over trade secrets has essentially come to an end in the legal dimension.