On April 8,

Core Conflict: $200 Subscription Fee vs. $5,000 Computing Cost
Cost Mismatch: The platform found that some heavy users paid only $200 per month for subscriptions via third-party frameworks, yet consumed computing resources worth $5,000.
Mandatory Switch: To ease the huge financial pressure, affected users must now switch to the API billing model, causing developers who relied on the subscription model's "free-riding" to suddenly stall.
Expert Opinion: Third-Party Frameworks Are "Black Holes" for Token Consumption
Regarding this incident,
Low Efficiency Trap: She pointed out that third-party frameworks, due to inefficient context management, often consume
Inevitable Loss Control: Faced with such inefficient resource consumption,
Industry Warning: Don't Let the "Token Price War" Become a Vicious Cycle
Reject Blind Price Reduction: Without clarifying the subscription pricing logic, blindly falling into a "Token price war" and allowing third-party tools to connect is equivalent to digging one's own grave.
What Is the Way Out: The real way out for the industry is not cheaper Tokens, but rather the "co-evolution of efficient frameworks and high-quality models".
Xiaomi Update: Pay-Per-Use Billing Is the Cure for the Ecosystem
While commenting on competitors' moves,
Token Plan Launch: The newly launched Token plan by
Long-Term Perspective: She believes that short-term cost pain will force third-party platforms to optimize their technology, thus promoting the AI ecosystem toward long-term healthy development.
Conclusion: The Cost Line in the Computing Era
As global computing resources gradually fail to keep up with the growth of intelligent agents (Agents), purely low-price strategies are no longer sustainable. From
