News from the Center for Humanistic Technology (CHT) has sparked widespread attention. The nonprofit organization focuses on promoting the ethical application of technology and recently issued a strong criticism of the Trump administration's latest executive order. The order aims to weaken the regulatory capacity of states over artificial intelligence (AI), and CHT believes this move poses a threat to public safety.

According to CHT, the new regulation limits the regulatory authority of states in the field of AI, without an effective national alternative framework, resulting in a so-called "regulatory vacuum." In such an environment, the public's awareness of the potential benefits and risks of AI is not given due attention. CHT emphasizes that the government should protect the public interest rather than provide a regulatory shield for the fast-growing tech industry.

The organization points out that the harms caused by AI technology are frequent, including deepfake technology, fraud, and psychological crises among teenagers caused by chatbots. They mention that the chaotic development of social media has already shown the consequences of lacking regulation, and therefore the government has a responsibility to take measures to ensure that technology develops for the better.

Trump argues that state regulations are hindering the rapid development of the industry. His view has been supported by some AI companies, including Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google, which also call for a unified national-level regulation.

CHT's position has once again sparked a discussion about the regulation of AI technology. The public expects to balance innovation with safety and ethics.

Key Points:

🌐1. The Center for Humanistic Technology strongly opposes the Trump executive order, believing it weakens state-level AI regulation and increases public risk.

⚖️2. CHT emphasizes the need for an effective regulatory framework to prevent harms caused by AI technologies, such as deepfakes and fraud.

🛡️3. Trump believes state-level regulations hinder industry development. He supports a unified national-level regulation, a view that has been endorsed by some AI companies.