Anthropic, a leading company in the U.S. large model industry, officially released the Claude Opus 4.8 large model at midnight today. However, while the model achieved outstanding results on multiple rankings, it has been reported by many netizens and developers to have "cognitive confusion" issues.

A netizen found through an API test that when asking the model about its identity, it mistakenly claimed to be Alibaba's "Qwen" or "DeepSeek," two major open-source large models in China.

API Testing Triggers Cognitive Abnormality

Regarding this phenomenon, some users testing on the web interface said they could not reproduce it and believed the model had not distilled Chinese large models. However, relevant developers explained that the web interface conversation had strict system prompts, which concealed this anomaly.

In contrast, in low-level API testing without any constraints, this issue was frequently reproduced. This directly indicates that the U.S. top-tier large model likely used a large amount of generation data from Chinese open-source large models for "distillation" during training or fine-tuning.

Inconsistent Behavior Raises Double Standards Criticism

This incident caused a big stir in the technology community, mainly because Anthropic previously showed a strong "anti-China" tendency. The company once collaborated with the U.S. Department of Defense and other departments to draft legislation, attempting to define "large model distillation" as an adversarial attack.

They not only called on the U.S. government to increase chip and software restrictions on China's AI industry but also proposed a strategic goal to achieve a two-year lead over China in AI by 2028. Now, their flagship model was caught distilling Chinese large models, ironically exposing their double standards.