Rabbit R1 Sells Over 10,000 Units on First Day, Exceeding Expectations


The Alibaba Cloud Yingying team is developing the AI device QwenBook, positioned as a native intelligent agent computer, with a form similar to the Qwen tablet, still in the early trial phase, focusing on office scenarios, integrating the Qwen3.8-Max and Flash models. The product definition and hardware are self-developed, integrating the Yingying Cloud PC system and end-cloud capabilities, with a team of about 150 people.
Unitree launched the bionic 7-axis dexterous robot arm R1 on Aug 20, priced from ¥9,900, sharply lowering the barrier for high-performance multi-axis robots. It offers 7-axis motion, humanoid redundant DOF, ~0.1 mm repeatability, >180°/s joint speed, and supports dexterous hands, attracting wide attention.....
Recently, Rabbit released a blog post and a video showcasing the features of its 'Versatile Android Agent.' This agent can control applications on Android tablets, demonstrating capabilities that were lacking in the promised Rabbit R1 device from a year ago. While the Humane AI Pin has faced setbacks, Rabbit seems to be moving forward. During this demonstration, engineers did not use the Rabbit R1 device.
Recently, engineers at Meta shared their thoughts on the anonymous social platform TeamBlind, revealing the immense pressure brought by the AI model R1 developed by the Chinese company DeepSeek. DeepSeek is considered to be the world's first open-source AI model comparable to OpenAI's o1 model. Compared to OpenAI, R1 not only has a higher degree of openness, but its training cost is astonishingly low, at just $5.5 million. In contrast, Meta's executives ...
Recently, the DeepSeek team in China has launched its latest open-source large model R1, which has gained widespread attention. The performance of the R1 model is exceptionally outstanding, surpassing OpenAI's o1 model in multiple tests, especially excelling in assessments related to mathematics and programming. In the latest AIME2024 test in the United States, R1 scored 79.8, outperforming o1's score of 79.2. In the MATH-500 test, R1 achieved a score of 97.3, again leading over o1.