The EU and Japan See 'Convergence' in Thinking About Generative AI


Under US regulatory pressure, OpenAI shifts GPT-5.6 rollout to a phased model, first testing with vetted partners, signaling that the AI arms race is prompting new policy interventions.....
ByteDance's Japan unit adjusts AI model services to mitigate copyright infringement risks, following government demands to halt unauthorized content generation, such as Disney IP videos, and warnings of potential user liabilities.....
In recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, especially driven by countries like the United States and China, has made AI a focal point of global technological competition. To this end, the EU recently announced a funding program of up to 200 billion euros to promote development in this field. Despite Germany's strong capabilities in AI research, why hasn't a single successful AI enterprise emerged? Source: Image generated by AI, image courtesy of service provider Midjourney according to Professor Bjorn from the University of Munich.
Recently, a spokesperson for Meta stated that the company will not immediately join the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Convention. This convention serves as a temporary measure to help businesses prepare for the upcoming regulations before the full implementation of the EU's AI Act. It is worth mentioning that this AI Act was approved by EU legislators in May of this year and is the world's first regulation specifically targeting the development and deployment of artificial intelligence. Under this act, companies will be required to provide a summary of the data used to train their AI models.
The EU AI Act came into effect on August 1, 2024, marking the beginning of a new era in AI regulation. The Act establishes clear standards and compliance requirements for AI applications within the EU, reflecting a governance strategy based on risk management. Following the implementation of the Act, AI developers and applications will be classified according to their risk levels, subject to varying compliance timelines. The use of AI technologies is prohibited in specific circumstances, such as law enforcement using remote biometrics in public spaces. High-risk AI applications must undergo stringent assessments and regulatory audits, while low-risk applications require.